Questions about Apollo lead to violence?
A few years back Buzz Aldrin punched a person for claiming the moon landings were fake. This leads me to these few points.
Why would Buzz care if some lunatic said something that wasn’t true? I woke up today and went to a restaurant, tomorrow, if some nut job accuses me of hoaxing the breakfast, I’m not going to respond so emotionally unless I was covering up something.
In Buzz”s defense, they reporter did insult him by calling him a liar and a coward, even though it was after calling that reporter a attention seeking opportunist.
Both were wrong, only one was vilified.
Truth is, Apollo astronauts only grant interviews to pro-Apollo journalists, with questions submitted in advance.
Questions about seeing stars from the moons surface, how they protected themselves from Van Allen radiation and deadly cosmic rays are not asked. Why was bright blue light shining through the windows when the spacecraft was supposedly 120,.000 miles from the bright blue light of low earth orbit? You will not hear questions about the LM’s decent engine leaving not one particle of dust on the landing pads. Instead, we get questions like how does it feel to be a hero? Or was the food any good on the trip? The only question that even touches on the inconsistencies of Apollo tend to be ones that ridicule those who dare question anything about a program that accomplished this miracle in the infancy of space flight, that today we nor anyone else can duplicate with proposed plans taking twenty years instead of the seven that Apollo needed.
The first and most famous Astronaut Neil Armstrong never grants interviews, the 2 he has done in 40 years where all tightly controlled.
In a democracy, patriotism is the act of questioning ones government, not blindly obeying it. Today people have been indoctrinated into a false and destructive believe that the opposite is true. Blind obedience allows democratic ideals to be lost and creates government without accountably.
Instead of accountability, we get prisons built to house the discontented. Instead of government conforming to the people’s will, it makes plans to arrest and break the will of those people it is not able to brainwash and intimidate.
You say that can’t happen in a free society? Your exactly right, except we are not a free society. We are slaves chanting brainwashed slogans of our free forefathers who told us our republic would fall when we allowed our economic system to be controlled by outside interests.
The police state affects us everyday, when we drive, fly, pay our excessive unconstitutional income taxes.
You think our speed limits are for our own protection? They are set to achieve the maximum level of profit. The German autobahn has no speed limit, its traffic fatalities compare to ours.
States are removing traffic cameras at intersections because once people are aware, there presence reduces infractions to virtually zero and unprofitable. Proof that safety has nothing to do with traffic agendas.
Police walking up to your car with a gun incites violence. Statistically, police are more likely to be criminals then you are.
The reason people believe propaganda is the people who fund and control government and it’s policies are the same ones who control the schools. The reason Detroit has ciriculem that enhances people’s abilities to work in a auto plant, being different then the ciriculem at a South Florida school which focuses on tourism and agriculture, is the same reason no school properly teaches you the ability to understand and question the actions of the goverment. It’s all on a need to know basis, and citizens generally do not need to know. The ones that do go to Harvard and Yale, and they won’t inform the lower classes, because they enjoy their status of control.
I cover much ground here because my point is we are tightly controlled.
We should be free to question.